On 2016-05-06 14:03:11 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/06/2016 02:01 PM, Josh berkus wrote: > > On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2016-05-06 13:54:09 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > On 05/06/2016 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > > > > There already is FREEZE - meaning something different - so I doubt it. > > > > > > > > Yeah I thought about that, it is the word "FORCE" that bothers me. When > > > > you > > > > use FORCE there is an assumption that no matter what, it plows through > > > > (think rm -f). So if we don't use FROZEN, that's cool but FORCE doesn't > > > > work > > > > either. > > > > > > SCANALL? > > > > > > > VACUUM THEWHOLEDAMNTHING > > > > I know that would never fly but damn if that wouldn't be an awesome keyword > for VACUUM.
It bothers me more than it probably should: Nobdy tests, reviews, whatever a complex patch with significant data-loss potential. But as soon somebody dares to mention an option name... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
