On 05/06/2016 02:12 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-05-06 14:10:04 -0700, Josh berkus wrote: >> On 05/06/2016 02:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> >>> It bothers me more than it probably should: Nobdy tests, reviews, >>> whatever a complex patch with significant data-loss potential. But as >>> soon somebody dares to mention an option name... >> >> Definitely more than it should, because it's gonna happen *every* time. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality > > Doesn't mean it should not be frowned upon.
Or made light of, hence my post. Personally I don't care what the option is called, as long as we have docs for it. For the serious testing, does anyone have a good technique for creating loads which would stress-test vacuum freezing? It's hard for me to come up with anything which wouldn't be very time-and-resource intensive (like running at 10,000 TPS for a week). -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
