On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> While looking at the module I found two mistakes in the docs: >> pg_visibility_map and pg_visibility *not* taking in input a block >> number are SRFs, and return a set of records. The documentation is >> just listing them with "returns record". A patch is attached. > > And that: s/PD_ALL_VISIBILE/PD_ALL_VISIBLE.
Committed. Thanks for the careful proofreading. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers