On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki < tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] > > Yeah, I think I agree. It would be bad to disable it by default on Unix, > > because ps(1) is a very standard tool there, but the same argument > doesn't > > hold for Windows. > > It seems that we could reach a consensus. The patch is attached. I'll > add this to the next CommitFest. > > > Another route to a solution would be to find a cheaper way to update the > > process title on Windows ... has anyone looked for alternatives? > > I couldn't find an alternative solution after asking some Windows support > staff. > FWIW, I remember this from back in the days when this was written. We kind of expected this would be slow already back then, but couldn't find a better way at the time either. And back then, I guess there were just enough *other* things that were slow with pg-on-windows that it didn't become as obvious. So - +1 for changing the defaults as suggested. What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or back further? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
