Robert Haas <> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <> wrote:
>> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
>> back further?

> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
> think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to