Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-08-04 16:48:11 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Here is a different proposal: documenting instead that disabling that >> parameter on Windows can improve performance, at the cost of losing >> information verbosity for processes.
> The benefit on windows seems pretty marginal, given the way it has to be > viewed. People installing processexplorer et. al. to view a handle that > have to know about, will be able to change the config. Yeah, I think I agree. It would be bad to disable it by default on Unix, because ps(1) is a very standard tool there, but the same argument doesn't hold for Windows. Another route to a solution would be to find a cheaper way to update the process title on Windows ... has anyone looked for alternatives? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers