On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or > back further?
I would have thought this was a master-only change, although back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN. I don't think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
