On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
> back further?

I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to