Hi, 2016-08-26 10:53 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>: > > There's still one issue, which I'll add a test for as well, which is > that if the index was created by the extension, it will be dumped > anyway. I'll have a look at that as well.
Looking at this issue today, I found that we are not setting a dependency for an index created inside an extension. I don't know if it's deliberate or an overlook. The thing is that we can't check pg_depend for dependency of an index and the extension that creates it. I was talking with other developers, and we kind of agree this is a bug, for 2 reasons we thought of: *) If the extension only creates an index over an existing table, a drop extension will not drop that index *) We need to have the dependency for this patch as well, else we'll end up with an inconsistent dump, or at least one that could restore with a != 0 return error code. I'll open a separate bug report for this. Regards, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers