Hi, I am getting a fatal error along with some warnings when trying to apply the v3 patch using "git apply" command.
[ashu@localhost postgresql]$ git apply 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch:29: trailing whitespace. brinfuncs.o ginfuncs.o hashfuncs.o $(WIN32RES) 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch:36: trailing whitespace. DATA = pageinspect--1.6.sql pageinspect--1.5--1.6.sql \ 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch:37: trailing whitespace. pageinspect--1.4--1.5.sql pageinspect--1.3--1.4.sql \ 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch:38: trailing whitespace. pageinspect--1.2--1.3.sql pageinspect--1.1--1.2.sql \ 0001-pageinspect-Hash-index-support_v3.patch:39: trailing whitespace. pageinspect--1.0--1.1.sql pageinspect--unpackaged--1.0.sql fatal: git apply: bad git-diff - expected /dev/null on line 46 Also, i think the USAGE for hash_metap() is refering to hash_metap_bytea(). Please correct it. I have just started reviewing the patch, will keep on posting my comments upon further review. Thanks. With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Jesper Pedersen > <jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2016 03:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> >>> You did not get right the comments from Alvaro upthread. The following >>> functions are added with this patch: >>> function hash_metap(text) >>> function hash_metap_bytea(bytea) >>> function hash_page_items(text,integer) >>> function hash_page_items_bytea(bytea) >>> function hash_page_stats(text,integer) >>> function hash_page_stats_bytea(bytea,integer) >>> >>> Now the following set of functions would be sufficient: >>> function hash_metapage_info(bytea) >>> function hash_page_items(bytea) >>> function hash_page_stats(bytea) >>> The last time pageinspect has been updated, when BRIN functions have >>> been added, it has been discussed to just use (bytea) as an argument >>> interface and just rely on get_raw_page() to get the pages wanted, so >>> I think that we had better stick with that and keep things simple. >>> >> >> Yes, I know, Alvaro and you voted for the bytea methods, and Jeff asked >> for both. >> >> Attached is v3 with only the bytea based methods. >> >> Alvaro, Michael and Jeff - Thanks for the review ! > > > > Is the 2nd "1" in this call needed? > > SELECT * FROM hash_page_stats(get_raw_page('mytab_index', 1), 1) > > As far as I can tell, that argument is only used to stuff into the output > field "blkno", it is not used to instruct the interpretation of the raw page > itself. It doesn't seem worthwhile to have the parameter that only echos > back to the user what the user already put in (twice). The only existing > funtions which take the blkno argument are those that don't use the > get_raw_page style. > > Also, should we document what the single letter values mean in the > hash_page_stats.type column? It is not obvious that 'i' means bitmap, for > example. > > Cheers, > > Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers