On 10/3/16 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am feeling consensus on removing source of PL from \dt+. There is partial consensus on saving this field (renamed) for C and internal language. I am not sure about consensus about \sf enhancing.
FWIW, I'm completely in favor of ditching PL source code. I'm neutral on C and internal.
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
