On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Patch attached. (Still using %t, I don't think %m makes sense for the > >> default.) > > > What is the cost of using %m, other than 4 (rather compressible) bytes > per > > log entry? > > More log I/O, which is not free ... and that remark about compressibility > is bogus for anyone who doesn't pipe their postmaster stderr into gzip. > I'm already afraid that adding the timestamps will get us some pushback > about log volume. > I don't pipe them into gzip, but every few months I go and pxz any of them more than few months old. Do you think the pushback will come from people who just accept the defaults? Cheers, Jeff
