On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: > Re: Stephen Frost 2016-10-12 <20161012190732.gj13...@tamriel.snowman.net> >> For my 2c, I'd rather have %m, but I definitely agree with Robert that >> we need to do *something* here and if the only thing holding us back is >> %t vs. %m, then let's just pick one and move on. I'll just hold my nose >> when I see the default and change it to %m. > > Here's the very same patch with %m instead of %t. Pick one :) > > (Fwiw, I'm still leaning towards %t, but my eyes are becoming more and > more accustomed to %m as well. I'd be fine with it as well. (I'd > rather want to try to get rid of the timezone identifier there...))
So, surveying this thread, what I see is: People who prefer %m: Jeff Janes, Devrim Gündüz, Stephen Frost People who prefer %t: Christoph Berg, Tom Lane (I think) We can kibitz this more later, but for now I've committed it with %m. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
