Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:44:05AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: >> I think the theory of having all system tables except LO on SSD storage, and >> having LO on a less performant device, makes sense.
> OK, so is this a TODO item? According to https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200407110311.i6B3BBW24899%40candle.pha.pa.us it already is ;-) Personally though I'd narrow the scope to just consider pg_largeobject (and maybe pg_largeobject_metadata). I see no use-case for moving other catalogs out of the DB's default tablespace, and doing so would create a large space of poorly-tested opportunities for failure. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
