Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> One idea would be to rename pg_resetxlog to pg_resetwal.  I think
> that's actually an improvement.

This would fit in as part of a general plan to s/xlog/wal/g throughout
our user-visible names and documentation.  Which seems like a good idea
to me; there's no need to expose two different terms for the same thing.

(I don't feel a great need to unify the terminology in the code, though.
Just in stuff users see.)

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to