Albe Laurenz <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to give this up as a bad job and go back to the
>> previous state. We have a solution that works and doesn't
>> produce warnings; third-party authors who don't want to use it
>> are on their own.
> I think you are right.
Done. We can always un-undo it if somebody has another idea.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
