On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> How do you plug in that with OpenSSL? Are you suggesting to use a set >>> of undef definitions in the new header in the same way as pgcrypto is >>> doing, which is rather ugly? Because that's what the deal is about in >>> this patch. >> >> Perhaps that justifies renaming them -- although I would think the >> fact that they are static would prevent conflicts -- but why reorder >> them and change variable names? > > Yeah... Perhaps I should not have done that, which was just for > consistency's sake, and even if the new reordering makes more sense > actually...
Yeah, I don't see a point to that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
