On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> writes: >> This xslt build takes 8+ minutes, compared to barely 1 minute for >> 'oldhtml'. > > I'm just discovering the same. > >> I'd say that is a strong disadvantage. > > I'd say that is flat out unacceptable. I won't ever use this toolchain > if it's that much slower than the old way. What was the improvement > we were hoping for, again?
Gosh, and I thought the existing toolchain was already ridiculously slow. Couldn't somebody write a Perl script that generated the HTML documentation from the SGML in, like, a second? I mean, we're basically just mapping one set up markup tags to another set of markup tags. And splitting up some files for the HTML version. And adding some boilerplate. But none of that sounds like it should be all that hard. I am reminded of the saying that XML is like violence -- if it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers