Pavel Stehule wrote:

> Here is updated patch without default namespace support (and without XPath
> expression transformation).
> Due last changes in parser
> I had to use c_expr on other positions ( xmlnamespace definition).
> I don't think it is limit - in 99% there will be const literal.

Argh.  I can't avoid the feeling that I'm missing some parser trickery
here.  We have the XMLNAMESPACES keyword and the clause-terminating
comma to protect these clauses, there must be a way to define this piece
of the grammar so that there's no conflict, without losing the freedom
in the expressions.  But I don't see how.  Now I agree that xml
namespace definitions are going to be string literals in almost all
cases (or in extra sophisticated cases, column names) ... it's probably
better to spend the bison-fu in the document expression or the column
options, or better yet the xmlexists_argument stuff.  But I don't see
possibility of improvements in any of those places, so let's put it
aside -- we can improve later, if need arises.

In any case, it looks like we can change c_expr to b_expr in a few
places, which is good because then operators work (in particular, unless
I misread the grammar, foo||bar doesn't work with c_expr and does work
with b_expr, which seems the most useful in this case).  Also, it makes
no sense to support (in the namespaces clause) DEFAULT a_expr if the
IDENT case uses only b_expr, so let's reduce both to just b_expr.

While I'm looking at node definitions, I see a few things that could use
some naming improvement.  For example, "expr" for TableExpr is a bit
unexpressive.  We could use "document_expr" there, perhaps.  "row_path"
seems fixated on the XML case and the expression be path; let's use
"row_expr" there.  And "cols" could be "column_exprs" perhaps.  (All
those renames cause fall-out in various node-related files, so let's
think carefully to avoid renaming them multiple times.)

In primnodes, you kept the comment that says "xpath".  Please update
that to not-just-XML reality.

Please fix the comment in XmlTableAddNs; NULL is no longer a valid value.

parse_expr.c has two unused variables; please remove them.

This test in ExecEvalTableExprProtected looks weird:
        if (i != tstate->for_ordinality_col - 1)
please change to comparing "i + 1" (convert array index into attribute
number), and invert the boolean expression, leaving the for_ordinality
case on top and the rest in the "else".  That seems easier to read.
Also, we customarily use post-increment (rownum++) instead of pre-incr.

In execQual.c I think it's neater to have ExecEvalTableExpr go before
its subroutine.  Actually, I wonder whether it is really necessary to
have a subroutine in the first place; you could just move the entire
contents of that subroutine to within the PG_TRY block instead.  The
only thing you lose is one indentation level.  I'm not sure about this
one, but it's worth considering.

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to