* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > This: > > >> Discussion: > >> https://postgr.es/m/20161128182113.6527.58...@wrigleys.postgresql.org > >> Discussion: > >> https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2xoebbrnq8rklyr+kj...@mail.gmail.com > > > still looks better than: > > >> Discussion: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161128182113.6527.58...@wrigleys.postgresql.org > >> Discussion: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2xoebbrnq8rklyr+kj...@mail.gmail.com > > Really? Somebody expressed the opposite preference upthread, and I agree. > "postgr.es" looks, at best, unofficial.
I find that to be a particularly compelling point. Also, while it's a pretty minor point, using the canonical form also avoids an unnecessary redirect. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
