All, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > I think this is a straw man. We've already decided to use message-IDs > as the basic identity of messages for this purpose; other proposals > were considered before and rejected as too inconvenient.
I tend to agree with Tom on this, for better or worse, message-ID is what we're using. Further, we seem agreed that URLs are what we want to have in the commits rather than just the message-ID. The question on the table at the moment seems to be if we want to use https://postgr.es/m/ or https://postgresql.org/message-id/ as the prefix. Personally, I don't really care and would prefer we just decide something and move on to more interesting technical discussion. I don't really agree with the complaints levied against https://postgr.es/m/, but I'm also not particularly bothered by one long line in each commit message. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature