On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Color me confused ... maybe systemd's behavior has changed? > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZNQW72UP36UAFMX53HPFFQTWTQDZVJ3M/ > > I see Lennart hasn't gotten any less convinced that he's always right > since I left Red Hat :-(
This thread does seem to give that impression. It's nice to know there are engineers in the world even more arrogant than we are. :-) > But anyway, it's a demonstrable fact that Fedora 25 has KillUserProcesses > off by default, even though it contains systemd-231. I assume FESCO > brought down the hammer at some point. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1600 seems to suggest that it's merely in abeyance. (See the first two updates and the last one for the executive summary.) > This still doesn't address the real question, which is whether RemoveIPC > does anything if KillUserProcesses is off, and whether that behavior > has changed. I don't see anything about RemoveIPC in that thread. http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi.pl?topic=logind.conf&sect=5 suggests that KillUserProcesses and RemoveIPC are separate cleanup behaviors triggered by the same underlying cause (termination of last session). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
