On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Color me confused ... maybe systemd's behavior has changed?
> I see Lennart hasn't gotten any less convinced that he's always right
> since I left Red Hat :-(
This thread does seem to give that impression. It's nice to know
there are engineers in the world even more arrogant than we are. :-)
> But anyway, it's a demonstrable fact that Fedora 25 has KillUserProcesses
> off by default, even though it contains systemd-231. I assume FESCO
> brought down the hammer at some point.
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1600 seems to suggest that it's merely
in abeyance. (See the first two updates and the last one for the
> This still doesn't address the real question, which is whether RemoveIPC
> does anything if KillUserProcesses is off, and whether that behavior
> has changed. I don't see anything about RemoveIPC in that thread.
suggests that KillUserProcesses and RemoveIPC are separate cleanup
behaviors triggered by the same underlying cause (termination of last
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: