On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From the discussions of last year on -hackers, it was decided to *not*
>>> have an additional column per complains from a couple of hackers
>>> (Robert you were in this set at this point), ...
>> Hmm, I don't recall taking that position, but then there are a lot of
>> things that I ought to recall and don't.  (Ask my wife!)
> [... digging objects of the past ...]
> From the past thread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoy790rphhbogxmbtg6mzsendoxdbxebekaet9zpz8g...@mail.gmail.com
> The complain is directed directly to multiple verifiers per users
> though, not to have the type in a separate column.

Yes, I rather like the separate column.  But since Heikki is doing the
work (or if he is) I'm not going to gripe too much.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to