On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From the discussions of last year on -hackers, it was decided to *not* >>> have an additional column per complains from a couple of hackers >>> (Robert you were in this set at this point), ... >> >> Hmm, I don't recall taking that position, but then there are a lot of >> things that I ought to recall and don't. (Ask my wife!) > > [... digging objects of the past ...] > From the past thread: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoy790rphhbogxmbtg6mzsendoxdbxebekaet9zpz8g...@mail.gmail.com > The complain is directed directly to multiple verifiers per users > though, not to have the type in a separate column.
Yes, I rather like the separate column. But since Heikki is doing the work (or if he is) I'm not going to gripe too much. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
