Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Doesn't this duplicate a function that we already invented for PQnotify
> >> structs?
> > What do you recommend?  Do we depricate PQfreeNotify?
> I dunno.  In hindsight it was shortsightedly named.  But I don't suppose
> we want to tell people to use "PQfreeNotify" to free the result of
> PQescapeBytea ... so deprecation seems to be the order of the day.
> Do we really want "PQfreemem" either?  Maybe it should be "PQfree"?

I am a little concerned that PQfree would be confused with PQclear.

Could we have PQfreeNotify() be a macro to PQfreemem in 7.4?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to