Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Doesn't this duplicate a function that we already invented for PQnotify > >> structs? > > > What do you recommend? Do we depricate PQfreeNotify? > > I dunno. In hindsight it was shortsightedly named. But I don't suppose > we want to tell people to use "PQfreeNotify" to free the result of > PQescapeBytea ... so deprecation seems to be the order of the day. > > Do we really want "PQfreemem" either? Maybe it should be "PQfree"?
I am a little concerned that PQfree would be confused with PQclear. Could we have PQfreeNotify() be a macro to PQfreemem in 7.4? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
