Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Doesn't this duplicate a function that we already invented for PQnotify > > >> structs? > > > > > What do you recommend? Do we depricate PQfreeNotify? > > > > I dunno. In hindsight it was shortsightedly named. But I don't suppose > > we want to tell people to use "PQfreeNotify" to free the result of > > PQescapeBytea ... so deprecation seems to be the order of the day. > > > > Do we really want "PQfreemem" either? Maybe it should be "PQfree"? > > I am a little concerned that PQfree would be confused with PQclear. > > Could we have PQfreeNotify() be a macro to PQfreemem in 7.4?
The only place I see PQfreeNotify() used in our code is libpgtcl, aside from libpq, and a macro would work fine. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
