On 2017-01-24 16:47:29 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I'm happy to go change every last bit of it.
I quite regret not aggressively opining against the renaming of pg_xlog to pg_wal. I think the few users deleting their data don't weigh against renaming a bunch of tools and function for some sense of consistency. This will cause pain for a couple years - maybe it'll be worth it 6-7 releases down the line, but I doubt before that. But then the original discussion was about renaming pg_xlog, not about a general s/xlog/$something/. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
