On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One thing to think about is what will happen if someday we want to use > 64-bit hash codes (a day I think is not that far away). It sounds like > you've already chosen bigint for any output field that represents a > hash code or a related value such as a mask ... but it wouldn't hurt > to look through the fields with that in mind.
Yeah, I think we're fine on that score. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
