Jim Nasby <jim.na...@openscg.com> writes: > It's actually a lot harder to mess up providing a git repo link than > manually submitting patches to the mailing list.
Yeah, we've heard that proposal before. We're still not doing it though. Insisting on patches being actually submitted to the mailing list is important for archival and possibly legal reasons. If someone sends in a link to $random-repo, once that site goes away there's no way to determine exactly what was submitted. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers