Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-03-11 11:48:31 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> I think that'd be a good plan. We probably should also keep --outputdir >> seperate (which test_decoding/Makefile does, but >> pg_isolation_regress_check doesn't)?
> Here's a patch doing that (based on yours). I'd be kind of inclined to > set --outputdir for !isolation tests too; possibly even move tmp_check > below output_iso/ output_regress/ or such - but that seems like it > potentially could cause some disagreement... This looks generally sane to me, although I'm not very happy about folding the "$(MKDIR_P) output_iso" call into pg_isolation_regress_check --- that seems weird and unlike the way it's done for the regular regression test case. But probably Peter has a better-informed opinion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers