From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ashutosh Bapat > The scope of this work has expanded, since last time I reviewed and marked > it as RFC. Right now I am busy with partition-wise joins and do not have > sufficient time to take a look at the expanded scope. > However, I can come back to this after partition-wise join, but that may > stretch to the end of the commitfest. Sorry.
I marked this as ready for committer. The code looks good, make check passed, ran read/write pgbench for some period to cause checkpoint with WAL file removal, and pg_ctl stop. The checkpoint emitted the following message, and there were no message like "could not ..." that indicates a file unlink or directory sync failure. LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 1835 buffers (11.2%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 1 removed, 0 recycled; write=0.725 s, sync=0.002 s, total=0.746 s; s\ ync files=9, longest=0.002 s, average=0.000 s; distance=16381 kB, estimate=16381 kB Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers