> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think
> so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before considering
> applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others?
I think so, too. As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to
all releases, maybe we can follow that. In addition, keeping code differences
as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply other bug fixes
to all versions.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: