> > > But that seems pretty ugly. Given the lack of previous reports, I'm > personally content to leave this unfixed in the back branches. > > Comments? > > Most instances of this I've seen out in the field have worked around this by just running analyze in the scheduled jobs after the refresh so we're probably good not back patching.
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Jim Nasby
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Jim Mlodgenski
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Jim Nasby
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Robert Haas
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Jim Mlodgenski
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Michael Paquier
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Jim Mlodgenski
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] mat views sta... Jim Mlodgenski