On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier >> Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think >> so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before considering >> applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others? > > I think so, too. As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to > all releases, maybe we can follow that. In addition, keeping code > differences as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply > other bug fixes to all versions.
The patch of HEAD applies cleanly on REL9_6_STABLE, further down it needs some work but not much either. I am fine to produce those patches should there be any need to. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
