On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
>> Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think
>> so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before considering
>> applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others?
> I think so, too.  As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to 
> all releases, maybe we can follow that.  In addition, keeping code 
> differences as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply 
> other bug fixes to all versions.

The patch of HEAD applies cleanly on REL9_6_STABLE, further down it
needs some work but not much either. I am fine to produce those
patches should there be any need to.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to