> On 2017-04-04 16:56:26 -0700, 'Andres Freund' wrote:
>> On 2017-04-04 23:52:28 +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>> > From: Andres Freund [mailto:and...@anarazel.de]
>> > > Looks to me like npgsql doesn't do that either.  None of libpq, pgjdbs 
>> > > and
>> > > npgsql doing it seems like some evidence that it's ok.
>> > 
>> > And psqlODBC now uses always libpq.
>> > 
>> > Now time for final decision?
>> I'll send an updated patch in a bit, and then will wait till tomorrow to
>> push. Giving others a chance to chime in seems fair.
> Attached.  I did not like that the previous patch had the timeout
> handling duplicated in the individual functions, I instead centralized
> it into start_xact_command().  Given that it already activated the
> timeout in the most common cases, that seems to make more sense to
> me. In your version we'd have called enable_statement_timeout() twice
> consecutively (which behaviourally is harmless).
> What do you think?  I've not really tested this with the extended
> protocol, so I'd appreciate if you could rerun your test from the
> older thread.

Ok, I will look into your patch and test it out using pgproto.

Best regards,
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to