From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tatsuo Ishii > Hmm. IMO, that could happen even with the current statement timeout > implementation as well. > > Or we could start/stop the timeout in exec_execute_message() only. This > could avoid the problem above. Also this is more consistent with > log_duration/log_min_duration_statement behavior than now.
I think it's better to include Parse and Bind as now. Parse or Bind could take long time when the table has many partitions, the query is complex and/or very long, some DDL statement is running against a target table, or the system load is high. Firing statement timeout during or after many Parses is not a problem, because the first Parse started running some statement and it's not finished. Plus, Andres confirmed that major client drivers don't use such a pattern. There may be an odd behavior purely from the perspective of E.Q.P, that's a compromise, which Andres meant by "not perfect but." Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers