On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:44:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:00:52AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> at this point, you can see, we've squarely left O(N) country, and > >> entered the vast O(N^2) waste. > > > OK, I got it now. :-) Here is the new item: > > > Improve table creation speed in sessions that reference many > > relations (Aleksander Alekseev) > > That's not specifically about table creation. How about > > Reduce statistics tracking overhead in sessions that reference > many thousands of relations (Aleksander Alekseev) > > I think it is fair, based on Andres' example, to quantify this as not > being of much interest till you get to thousands of relations. But > it would matter for any action that creates a statistics report, > whether it be scans, inserts, updates, deletes ...
OK, text updated. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
