Hi, On 2017-04-25 13:39:07 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Understood, but the question is whether the release notes are the right > place to educate users of something that will no longer be a problem.
I think it's the *prime* place for it. It obviously doesn't matter if you're not affected by $performance_problem, but if you are affected, then it's quite likely going to be important. Deciding whether to migrate to a new version will often be a decision about a *lot* of work, so it'll not be made lightly, and without a motivator. If we go by that logic, why are we listing parallelism? Why are we listing new planner/executor features that lead to faster plans? The reason we do, is that they're addressing concerns that users had, which they need to know about. > I am happy to adjust things to whatever the community wants, but, on the > other hand I have a responsibility to be consistent what what they have > wanted in the past. Why? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
