Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 5/17/17 11:37, Tom Lane wrote: >> Concretely, how about the attached? I don't think this looks any >> worse than the current layout.
> The previous setup has been in place for years and has never been a > problem. The alternatives are all quite a bit worse. No, the previous setup hasn't been "in place for years". These programs were only NLS-ified last fall. Before that the code looked like, eg, printf(" -z, --stats[=record] show statistics instead of records\n"); printf(" (optionally, show per-record statistics)\n"); so that there weren't string continuations for pgindent to fool with. I'm not really convinced that having usage() print two- or three-line switch descriptions is "quite a bit better" than what I suggested. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers