Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Not sure about actually incorporating it into our repo. Doing so would >> make it easier for people to use, for sure, and the license seems to be >> regular 3-clause BSD, so that angle is OK. But do we want to be carrying >> around another 150K of source code?
> The alternatives are > 1. rely on the dead code we've been using so far (the old BSD indent > patched with our Pg-specific tweaks), or > 2. rely on someone else's upstream code -- in this case, FreeBSD's as > patched by Piotr. > Now that Piotr's is about to find a home, perhaps it's okay for us to > rely on that one. I just didn't like the idea of running something from > Piotr's personal repo. Well, "pg_bsd_indent is whatever you can find in the FreeBSD repo" is not a rule that is going to work either. We need to have a standardized version that all developers can run and get the same results. So I think we'll either have a blessed tarball that we pass around (same as we do now), or we'll put it into our own tree. I don't really see much downside to the latter except bloat. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers