On 5/24/17 15:38, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> I wonder if we actually need the SKIP REFRESH syntax, there is the >>> "REFRESH [ WITH ... ]" when user wants to refresh, so if REFRESH is not >>> specified, we can just behave as if SKIP REFRESH was used, it's not like >>> there is 3rd possible behavior. >> >> Attached patch does exactly that. > > And of course I forgot to update docs...
Do we want not-refreshing to be the default behavior? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
