On 27/05/17 04:00, Euler Taveira wrote: > 2017-05-26 21:29 GMT-03:00 Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com > <mailto:petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com>>: > > > Actually another possibility would be to remove the REFRESH keyword > completely and just have [ WITH (...) ] and have the refresh option > there, ie simplified version of what you have suggested (without the > ugliness of specifying refresh twice to disable). > > > It will cause confusion. It seems that WITH sets ALTER SUBSCRIPTION > properties. Indeed, they are REFRESH properties. I think we shouldn't > exclude REFRESH keyword. Syntax leaves no doubt that WITH are REFRESH > properties. >
Maybe, I don't know, it might not be that confusing when SET PUBLICATION and REFRESH PUBLICATION have same set of WITH options. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
