2017-05-26 21:29 GMT-03:00 Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> > Actually another possibility would be to remove the REFRESH keyword > completely and just have [ WITH (...) ] and have the refresh option > there, ie simplified version of what you have suggested (without the > ugliness of specifying refresh twice to disable). It will cause confusion. It seems that WITH sets ALTER SUBSCRIPTION properties. Indeed, they are REFRESH properties. I think we shouldn't exclude REFRESH keyword. Syntax leaves no doubt that WITH are REFRESH properties. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento <http://www.timbira.com.br>
