2017-05-26 21:29 GMT-03:00 Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com>:

> Actually another possibility would be to remove the REFRESH keyword
> completely and just have [ WITH (...) ] and have the refresh option
> there, ie simplified version of what you have suggested (without the
> ugliness of specifying refresh twice to disable).

It will cause confusion. It seems that WITH sets ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
properties. Indeed, they are REFRESH properties. I think we shouldn't
exclude REFRESH keyword. Syntax leaves no doubt that WITH are REFRESH

   Euler Taveira                                   Timbira -
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

Reply via email to