On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Putting that in a couple of words.
>> 1. Table AM with a 6-byte TID.
>> 2. Table AM with a custom locator format, which could be TID-like.
>> 3. Table AM with no locators.
>> Getting into having #1 first to work out would already be really
>> useful for users.
> What exactly would be useful for *users*?  Any kind of API itself is
> completely useless for users, because they are users, not developers.
> Storage API could be useful for developers to implement storage AMs whose in
> turn could be useful for users.

What's your point?  I assume that is what Michael meant.

> Then while saying that #1 is useful for
> users, it would be nice to keep in mind particular storage AMs which can be
> implemented using #1.

I don't think anybody's arguing with that.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to