On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Putting that in a couple of words. >>> 1. Table AM with a 6-byte TID. >>> 2. Table AM with a custom locator format, which could be TID-like. >>> 3. Table AM with no locators. >>> >>> Getting into having #1 first to work out would already be really >>> useful for users. >> >> What exactly would be useful for *users*? Any kind of API itself is >> completely useless for users, because they are users, not developers. >> Storage API could be useful for developers to implement storage AMs whose in >> turn could be useful for users. > > What's your point? I assume that is what Michael meant.
Sorry for the confusion. I implied here that users are the ones developing modules. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
