Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was >>> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers >>> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check". Shouldn't we catch simple >>> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible?
>> Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound >> like a win. > If it takes 100ms, nobody's gonna notice. I doubt running a perl script that analyzes the entire backend source code is gonna take 100ms. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers