Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > This thread is surprising. If we generate the few lines of code being > in trouble, we don't need any checker script, so I don't see why we'd go > the route of the checker script instead.
I think generating whatever we can from a single authoritative file is indeed a good idea. But I had the impression that people also wanted to enforce a rule about "only one use of each wait event name", which'd require a checker script, no? (I'm not really convinced that we need such a rule, fwiw.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers