On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was
>> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers
>> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check".  Shouldn't we catch simple
>> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible?
> Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound
> like a win.

If it takes 100ms, nobody's gonna notice.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to