On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was >> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers >> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check". Shouldn't we catch simple >> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible? > > Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound > like a win.
If it takes 100ms, nobody's gonna notice. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers