On 08/09/2017 10:49 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>>> This item appears under "decisions to recheck mid-beta".  If anyone is going
>>> to push for a change here, now is the time.
>> It has been 1 week since the previous mail. I though that there were
>> others argued to change the behavior of old-style setting so that a
>> quorum commit is chosen. If nobody is going to push for a change we
>> can live with the current behavior?
> FWIW, I still see no harm in keeping backward-compatibility here, so I
> am in favor of a statu-quo.

I am vaguely in favor of making quorum the default over "ordered".
However, given that anybody using sync commit without
understanding/customizing the setup is going to be sorry regardless,
keeping backwards compatibility is acceptable.

Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to