On 08/09/2017 10:49 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >>> This item appears under "decisions to recheck mid-beta". If anyone is going >>> to push for a change here, now is the time. >> >> It has been 1 week since the previous mail. I though that there were >> others argued to change the behavior of old-style setting so that a >> quorum commit is chosen. If nobody is going to push for a change we >> can live with the current behavior? > > FWIW, I still see no harm in keeping backward-compatibility here, so I > am in favor of a statu-quo. >
I am vaguely in favor of making quorum the default over "ordered". However, given that anybody using sync commit without understanding/customizing the setup is going to be sorry regardless, keeping backwards compatibility is acceptable. -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
