Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I don't think I can usefully contribute to this. Could someone else >> take it?
> If nobody volunteers, you could always resolve this by reverting 1e8a850 and > successors. I think you're blaming the victim. Our current theory about the cause of this is that on Windows, WaitLatchOrSocket cannot be used to wait for completion of a nonblocking connect() call. That seems pretty broken independently of whether libpqwalreceiver needs the capability. In any case, we have a draft patch, so what we should be pressing for is for somebody to test it. Peter's not in a position to do that (and neither am I), but anyone who can build from source on Windows could do so. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers