On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> -->  * reconstruct the row for EvalPlanQual(). Find an alternative local 
>>> path
>>> Should the marked line simply be deleted?  If not, what correction is
>>> appropriate?
>> Hmm, wow.  My first thought was that it should just say
>> "reconstructing" rather than "reconstruct", but on further reading I
>> think you might have the right idea.
> The current text of the comment dates to commit 177c56d60, and looking at
> that commit makes it pretty clear that the line I'm complaining of
> belonged to the previous text; it evidently just missed getting deleted.

Got it.  Nice forensics, and sorry about the good.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to