On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> --> * reconstruct the row for EvalPlanQual(). Find an alternative local >>>> path >>>> Should the marked line simply be deleted? If not, what correction is >>>> appropriate? >> >>> Hmm, wow. My first thought was that it should just say >>> "reconstructing" rather than "reconstruct", but on further reading I >>> think you might have the right idea. >> >> The current text of the comment dates to commit 177c56d60, and looking at >> that commit makes it pretty clear that the line I'm complaining of >> belonged to the previous text; it evidently just missed getting deleted. > > Got it. Nice forensics, and sorry about the good.
... goof. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers